Fixup some minor issues in HPKE P-256 key derivation p256_private_key_from_seed should reject the zero scalar. It is computationally infeasible to find any input that hits this case, so no unit test or practical consequence, but we should match the spec I suppose. See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.html#name-derivekeypair Also add some missing error checks for p256_public_from_private. Other than the computationally infeasible zero scalar above, this is impossible except for ec_point_mul_scalar_base's fault protection logic (which is impossible unless there's another bug or CPU fault). Change-Id: I6961601f4036829c8dba990922b4135c0e141df8 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/95188 Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Presubmit-BoringSSL-Verified: boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: