Ignore CMS_PARTIAL in CMS_add1_signer Currently we reject it, but I'm actually not sure what the intent there was. We already defer actually signing it to the end anyway. Looking at OpenSSL, they only look at CMS_PARTIAL as part of this CMS_REUSE_DIGEST mode that we do not implement. The kernel started passing a bunch of unused flags to all these functions. This seems a mistake[*] because CMS_PARTIAL is really a per-operation thing, but it also seems to be harmless so we may as well keep it working. [*] They also pass it to CMS_final which *really* doesn't make sense. Ah well. Bug: 316589225 Change-Id: Id88bd659848975814363fbd26355196e4d712cb5 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/90287 Reviewed-by: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com> Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: