audit_symbols: Allow Windows RTTI descriptors to be unprefixed On Windows, if A subclasses B and A has a vtable, Windows will emit RTTI descriptors for B. This happens even if B is a trivial type, which breaks our type name strategy. Fortunately, these RTTI descriptors only describe B's inheritance structure, which we can reasonably assume is trivial, so it is OK if they are unprefixed. Suppress those symbols for now. It's not amazing, but is probably fine. If it breaks later, we can always reach for /GS- or so. Some notes on C++ name mangling in MSVC for reference: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Visual_C%2B%2B_name_mangling#Special_Name Bug: 42220000 Change-Id: I2885b5068de80b61d575c6cb6439907d86f01a1a Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/89967 Reviewed-by: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: