audit_symbols: Allow Windows RTTI descriptors to be unprefixed

On Windows, if A subclasses B and A has a vtable, Windows will emit RTTI
descriptors for B. This happens even if B is a trivial type, which
breaks our type name strategy. Fortunately, these RTTI descriptors only
describe B's inheritance structure, which we can reasonably assume is
trivial, so it is OK if they are unprefixed.

Suppress those symbols for now. It's not amazing, but is probably fine.
If it breaks later, we can always reach for /GS- or so.

Some notes on C++ name mangling in MSVC for reference:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Visual_C%2B%2B_name_mangling#Special_Name

Bug: 42220000
Change-Id: I2885b5068de80b61d575c6cb6439907d86f01a1a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/89967
Reviewed-by: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: 094b1382f72533d246b7b1fcafe91288f41087a3
  1. .bcr/
  2. bench/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .bazelversion
  20. .clang-format
  21. .clang-format-ignore
  22. .gitignore
  23. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  24. AUTHORS
  25. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  26. BUILD.bazel
  27. build.json
  28. BUILDING.md
  29. CMakeLists.txt
  30. codereview.settings
  31. CONTRIBUTING.md
  32. FUZZING.md
  33. go.mod
  34. go.sum
  35. INCORPORATING.md
  36. LICENSE
  37. MODULE.bazel
  38. MODULE.bazel.lock
  39. PORTING.md
  40. PRESUBMIT.py
  41. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  42. README.md
  43. SANDBOXING.md
  44. SECURITY.md
  45. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: